The G20 And The New Global System

The fifth summit of the G20, which represents 90% of the world economy as its main challenge, in November 2010, recovery coordination of national monetary and economic policies that the group was on their first date in Washington in November 2008 at the beginning of the crisis, told reporters.

I have not given accurate solutions, effective. I think every leader has thought to cover himself. I think we try to ensure and bolster the economy harm than good to their national sovereignty, without any concern for the traveler, the man in the street, the final pagan or what may be of many other nations. And it has only served to reaffirm the "double game" of a similar process that led to the first major war powers meet to divide the territories they understand "no owner". They are aware - as were the Central Powers and the other leaders of the nineteenth century - that greed can lead mankind to the disaster, but go ahead with the double play and press just do not plan to meet commitments, convinced that the unequal exchange laws do their job and the owners eventually biggest "win" foulbrood happen happen.

They have not been passed by the chola join global coalition under the umbrella of a single world democratic renewed UN and at least consider the value of each individual. We all feel real citizens of the UN and national pride go and vote for leaders who preach by example in the integration of the entire human race in the division of labor in the world and the more equitable distribution of global wealth, that is huge and there's plenty for six billion human beings. Simple but make it seem all very complicated. I disagree that really going to end up "winning" really the greatest. A Pyrrhic victory. The glass is nearly filled and the drop is not a single drop but every drop that we all believe we are no longer so much demagogy to continue squandering and speculating privileged few who resist change in social macroeconomics. Globalization, but the real, which has every human, is a way to dignify the world economy and finally overcome the crisis. If, in addition began to work on this "new global" mighty men, fed up with both private fortunes muskrat, the layout of a more just world finally reach the goal of the summit statement.

A global solution. But understood in this way, which is rather close to the spirit of the anti-global ...

Nothing really set if the most powerful countries do not yield their sovereignty to a UN transformed and truly democratic without the right of veto of the most buoyant. If the G20 countries do not adapt to the new global system, the economy will suffer the same tail so far. Believe it or not in God, the future of humanity passes by spiritual and moral foundations. Macroeconomics is a reflection of world order, whose base is cracking. Only by uniting the planet, with all the cultural contributions and the very essence of all civilizations, past, present and future shed in a single universal configuration, sovereign, and will follow their courtrooms, where each one will do what you can do the other to the base which is the free individual. A new system that goes from I to the UN, in an organic pyramid autonomy in all courtrooms, forming a federation subsidiary in which no one will be out, or be neglected or abandoned. And wealth and well distributed will be global, without these differences that make it impossible for the G20 now going to give any solution to the crisis without taking into account the new global system, what I call the 'Globalization authentic'

Carlos YAGO